So I'll ask it very quickly.
Among the criteria that must be used to determine whether a bill can be considered as non-votable, the following has been stated: Bills and motions should not clearly violate the Constitution Acts, 1867 to 1982, including the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
The mere fact that we are holding this debate here today shows that this is not clear. In that sense, the bill does not clearly violate the Constitution of Canada. In my opinion, we should allow the political debate to be held in the House, as was done with regard to the French Language Charter that would apply to the federal institutions.