Yes, and that is pretty much the problem. On February 17, the Government House Leader tabled this document in the House. And basically, this document is the same as the other one, but with additional detail.
The Speaker of the House made his ruling on March 7. That means that the Speaker is of the view that this document or the one before it does not comply with the orders issued by the House and that the fundamental principle is that parliamentarians have the right to receive all the information.
Some means must be found to protect national security and the public interest. We are evidence of that because, with respect to the Afghan documents, we were able to find a mechanism that suited both Liberal and Bloc members.
How is it that for the rest of the documentation that you have not submitted, you are unable to carry out the same kind of process—in other words, to have a special committee or some other body become involved so that we are able to see all the documents and ensure that the information made available is indeed adequate and complies with the request made in the House?
For the time being, I am not satisfied, because these documents are pretty much the same. In both cases, there was the ruling by the Speaker on March 7.
Would you be prepared to consider setting up the same type of mechanism as the one used for the Afghan documents? Actually, I should say that, unfortunately, a member of the panel died Sunday. I want to extend my condolences to his family.