That's a very valid and important consideration. There is always, obviously, the national interest. I'm sure every member of this committee is cognizant of the national interest in the context of national security or national defence issues. Outside of that, what the national interest is for withholding information or disclosing it, as the case may be, may be the subject of considerable debate.
What can the committee do? It might try to find ways of receiving sensitive information, at least initially, confidentially. I know there have been difficulties with committees maintaining the confidentiality of information they receive, but that's one way of doing it. Upon review of the information, the committee might then decide, as it's entitled to do, which of the information is properly not disclosed and which should be disclosed.