I think the Speaker in his ruling, where he commented that there are no reasons provided, says:
It may be that valid reasons exist. That is not for the Chair to judge. A committee empowered to investigate the matter might, but the Chair is ill-equipped to do so.
That's a quote from his ruling. So I think I'm answering your question, Mr. McGuinty. Mr. Speaker was saying that he didn't see reasons for the information not being provided, and in the face of the parliamentary right to have the information, he would expect that if the information is not being provided there would be some explanation, and he doesn't see one. He is not saying there are no such reasons. He's just saying “I don't see one”, so it warrants being looked into by this committee more closely.