Certainly it was our position that the February 17 information did that, and we did that in good faith. Now we're providing this additional information in good faith, even though the Speaker's ruling itself doesn't specify if there are any specific deficiencies. That's not indicated anywhere in the ruling.
It's a lot like facing a criminal charge and someone saying you've done something wrong, but there's nothing specified. A Criminal Code charge is simply handed to your client that says this is the charge. Well, it's very difficult to respond in that way.
We believe that the information we've provided is fulsome. It was made in good faith, and it honours in every respect the concerns the Speaker may have had.