I can indicate that the material was gone through very thoroughly, first of all for the February 17 information that was provided by public servants throughout our respective departments and again in compiling this documentation that was presented here today. If we did a submission a month from now, there would be a variance. That's the nature of this type of documentation, but I am confident, based on my conversations with the public officials, that there are no substantive variances in any respect that would in any way give the committee a false impression of what was submitted on February 17 vis-à-vis what has been submitted today. There will always be variances on a month-to-month basis.
Is all of this material 100% accurate? It's as accurate as my officials could possibly make it. Could there be one mistake in here? I'm not prepared to say there isn't, but I think in overwhelming substance, there is no substantive variance.