It's an immensely complicated thing, though. I'll give you an example.
Last year and the year before, this House, this Parliament, passed budget implementation acts. In these were bills that in my view really were not implementing the budget but were separate things affecting environmental assessment.
The end product of this is that the number of our environmental assessments being made by the federal government will be reduced by about 6,000 a year. There is a saving because those are not being made, and I suspect the reductions in the estimates of the Department of Environment are because of that.
Now, is that a good thing or a bad thing? I don't know, but what I suspect is that it's not a good thing because I like seeing environmental assessments.