I don't disagree with you on the order of magnitude, the difference between what Minister Oda did to Margaret Biggs as opposed to what Minister Clement did to Munir Sheikh. The magnitude is different, but the point is the same.
The point is that a civil servant, a faithful civil servant, a capable civil servant, an intelligent civil servant, giving the best possible advice, is made to appear in public as having given the exact opposite advice that they gave to the minister. That goes directly to your core point, which is ministerial accountability.
Am I interpreting your remarks correctly?