No, that's fine.
You said that there is some confusion. But last February 14, you made this statement in the House of Commons: If some were led to conclude that my language implied that the department and I were of one mind on this application, then I apologize.
You acknowledged, at least in connection with your reply to question 106 on the Order Paper, that your language could have been misinterpreted and that it could be concluded that CIDA and you were of one mind. Is that the reply in your statement?