No, but it isn't an unreasonable expectation as a general rule, and it will be up to us whether we apply that general rule to what we have heard.
The intent to mislead the committee began with her less than fulsome answer to Mr. McKay, but she carried on and continued to attempt to mislead the House by allowing this misunderstanding to linger--I don't have the dates any more--from March till December, with ample opportunities to correct the misunderstanding.
We were led to believe there's no political motivation associated with denying Kairos their funding, that it was the recommendation of CIDA. If you have to figure out the motivation, I think there is a strong political motivation that began when this information was released through a freedom of information request. It was in their interest for the public to believe the denial of Kairos' funding was a legitimate recommendation of CIDA and not some off-the-wall, arbitrary political motivation, such as not liking this organization because they think they're anti-Israel. That was the motivation we seem to be arriving at here.