Well, we are splitting hairs and putting everything Minister Oda said under a microscope, as we should, given the gravity of the situation. There's something kind of Chrétienesque about Minister Oda's comments throughout, and it's hard to nail it down, but we do expect ministers to conduct themselves at the highest standard of honesty.
I mean, do you accept that a minister could be in contempt if the offence is by omission rather than commission, if the minister allowed us to believe what a logical person would believe in reading that document, that the CIDA officials recommended not funding?