Thank you.
I have a question for Ms. Biggs.
I mentioned that Mr. Franks was here earlier. Mr. Franks was concerned that the document we're all referring to here, this internal document--I referred to as an interoffice memo--the recommendation document, was a forgery because of the insertion of the word “not” and the minister's penned signature.
Ms. Biggs, did you or any of your officials feel, upon receiving that document back from the minister, that your advice had been altered or that in fact this was an attempt to deceive or to forge a document? Did you have any impression or opinion, at that time, that this was not anything more than the minister merely conveying her displeasure and disapproval of the recommendation?