Mr. Chairman, I understand that the member is saying that the statement of fact, if you call it that here, is only a factual situation appreciated after the fact at some time later. You know, if I'm at a wedding and I think it's a wonderful wedding, and then later on it's found out that one of the parties to the wedding, the bride or the groom, was already married and so it was a bigamous, fraudulent marriage, well, I didn't know that. I was just sitting there at the wedding and doing my thing. Am I going to be blamed for attending a bigamous, fraudulent marriage? No, and if anybody said that I supported a bigamous, fraudulent marriage, I'd say, wait a minute, I just went to a marriage; I went to a wedding.
So in that sense, yes, you could be wrongly accused of participating and consenting to something that later proves to have been something other than what you went to. I don't know if that's the case here, but I take your point.