That is a good question, Mr. Guimond. As you know, the courts usually consider the issue objectively, not subjectively. However, a person may really have difficulty accepting certain comments. Earlier, I gave you the example of a person's moral character. I am not talking about the mailing in question, but about how things happen in general. Certainly, there are comments from both sides. They go back and forth. Are they true or false? It is up to you to decide, not me.
As for the objective aspect, the approach, the procedure to take to reach a conclusion, you must consider the evidence. Will witnesses provide evidence proving that harm was done or not done to Mr. Cotler? If there is no evidence, all the members may still consider that a given comment infringes on the member's privileges and impedes his ability to function as a member. That is just a committee finding. That is all. It is subjective, but the committee has the right to make that decision.