Obviously, all the witnesses on the list came from somebody at this table. They came through the chair and the clerk. The clerk and I have looked at the list and tried to put it together in reasonable panels.
At this moment I'm not trying to determine what testimony we'll get from any witness. Obviously when a witness gives testimony, through questions from members of this panel, we'll have the ability to say that we can't go in that direction, that it's not proving our point on privilege.
Mr. Walsh has given us the diagram, if you will, on looking at factualness and looking at objectivity. At some point, if those were found to be right, then we would move into the injurious part of the breach of privilege.
I'm just going to suggest that if a witness is giving us testimony that doesn't head us that way, then the testimony will stop. But at this moment, witnesses have been asked by members of this panel to be here. I think they have as much right as anyone to ask for those people to be here.
If the testimony goes south, well certainly, as I've done today a couple of times with you, I will cut them off and say that's not heading in the direction we need it to go, on the breach of privilege.