I think Mr. Speaker summed it up well when he murmured to me just now, “What cameras?”
I think we've crossed over a border. We now find that cameras are really ubiquitous, because anybody who has a smart phone has a camera. That wasn't the case before, so it was much more intrusive, if you will, than it is now, but I think a certain common sense prevails. If it's an occasion on which people are taking mementoes of a very special day--the apology, for instance, for the residential schools, the Olympic torch, and so forth--I think nobody would object, because pretty well everybody is taking part. That doesn't mean that it's different.
I think the original intention, going back to first principles, was the idea that you weren't to disrespect colleagues by taking pictures of them, say, reading newspapers, having a doze, or doing other things that would not be easily explicable to the outside world. A picture of someone who's particularly hardworking and tired--