I disagree with that. We can all understand simple math. I think we can all see it. The fact is, we're both elevating the numbers of the larger provinces, while maintaining some level of equilibrium between smaller provinces.
My concern from some testimony I have heard today—certainly in the first half—is that we seem to think of this country first as Ontario-Quebec. That seemed to satisfy some members when we look at seat redistribution. Then we add in British Columbia and Alberta, and then the rest are just considered to be parts of the federation, which aren't worthy to be included in this discussion. That troubles me—particularly when I see the Senate seats in the west, the six there—because I wonder how a federation works where the large provinces are moving towards representation by population, and the smaller provinces are just kind of shoved off and told they are all the same, even though they're actually all a little bit different.
I don't know if there's a comment to be made on that.