Okay. In terms of the role that we're now having to play as a committee in making a final determination as to whether there has been a breach of the privilege of the member, is the fact that you have threats combined with—let's assume—only offensive words not sufficient? It's very clear: “You must resign your seat and you must withdraw this legislation, or else”. Are the two combined, along with the clarity of what they are demanding as action on the part of the minister or the member, not sufficient to make a final determination of breach of privilege?
On March 27th, 2012. See this statement in context.