Thank you very much.
Thank you once again, Monsieur Mayrand.
I want to get back, if I can, to the complaints versus contacts, because you'd mentioned there were roughly 40,000 contacts. I suspect most, or many of them at least, came from e-mail-generated form letters from groups like Leadnow and the like. But if there are only 800.... And I'm not trying to minimize it; I concur with my colleague. If we're looking at 800 reasonably founded complaints over roughly 200 ridings, that would mean the average would be about four per riding, but it could mean that one riding had as little as one complaint lodged, or there could be as many as seven complaints in another riding.
But based on the election return.... You've said to your mind the election was still valid, and you signed the writs of election for all of these candidates who were elected. Since there's a court challenge in seven ridings, and we're talking about perhaps only an average of four complaints—in other words, perhaps as few as four examples, even if they were verified—of a voter receiving a vote suppression or misleading phone call trying to get them to go to another voting station or prevent them from voting in itself, what is the level that is required, going back to what David was saying, to overturn a result?
It wouldn't seem to me that if we were talking about only four complaints per riding, even if they were legitimate, that would be enough to overturn an election result. Do you have an opinion on what it would take to actually make you look at or even consider the possibility of overturning an election result?