Thank you, Mr. Chair.
In short, if I have understood correctly, a balance must be established between communicating information openly and transparently, and protecting our parliamentary privileges.
It was easy to see the difference with your example, which was very simple. No one would object to disclosing material that has already been made public or to providing information after the fact. Conversely, we really want to protect parliamentary privilege when it comes to in camera debates.
Regarding the grey area—somewhere in the between—I agree with Mr. Lukiwski. We would be glad to get your help in drawing a line between what is accessible and what is not. That would be something of a guide. It could be very useful to get your opinion on that issue. I don't know whether it would be simpler to consider that matter in a subcommittee. We could suggest it.