Perhaps an example would help.
In 2009, this committee submitted a report to the House, following hearings. The clerk and the law clerk actually appeared at that time. The topic was copyright related to the use of House of Commons debates.
As you know, on the last page is a statement regarding the Speaker's permission. In short, it says that House of Commons debates are privileged documents and the property of the House, but that they can be used, under certain conditions. The protection is maintained. However, the House allows users, educators and others, to use some of those documents without having to ask the House for permission every time.
That is the direction we are encouraging you to move in. Other types of documents could fall into those categories. The House could approve a report produced and submitted to it by this committee, which would set out the criteria a committee should follow before granting such a request. In other words, if a request meets the criteria outlined, the committee would pre-emptively have the permission of the House to share those documents as another party. If I have expressed my thoughts properly, I believe that is the direction you want to move in. You want to define the criteria that would make that possible.