Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Mr. Bosc, thank you for your presentation. It was very clear, and so were the answers to our questions.
Most of my questions have already been asked, but I just wanted to make sure I have understood correctly.
If I understand it correctly, there have been five or six instances in the past where requests were made for information, such as happened in this specific incident, where you did your job in saying that this was protected by parliamentary privilege and that it was therefore not accessible. This was not contested, if I'm correct.
I believe this is the first instance you did your interpretation but the House decided to waive its privilege. Am I correct in saying that this is the first instance of this happening?