No, and I will just go back to your first question about what's happening in other jurisdictions.
Other jurisdictions, even if they have access to information, have a process in place that recognizes the privileges of Parliament and the right for the House itself to make a decision as it relates to specific types of documentation. In the U.K. the Freedom of Information Act applies, but they refer to information that is exempt and necessary to avoid an infringement on the privileges of the House, and the Speaker produces a certificate saying the requested documents are protected by privilege and therefore they don't have to be released.
There's something similar in Alberta. The head of a public office may refuse to disclose information that is subject to any type of legal privilege, including solicitor-client privilege or parliamentary privilege. Only the Speaker of the legislative assembly may determine whether information is subject to parliamentary privilege. There's a process. Often they refer to the Speaker to make a decision about what is covered by privilege.
In our case, the act doesn't apply. What we're proposing is for members to find a way for themselves to make those decisions.