Not exactly. Again, I don't want to speak in the name of the Auditor General's legal counsel, but the way the position was presented to us is they did not find an exception for parliamentary privilege in the act, so they're saying there's nothing that allows us not to release the documents because it doesn't talk about privilege. However, the position being that we felt it was, we thought that going to court and asking the Federal Court for a decision about it would be the only way that they would accept that the documents could be released. That's why it ended up as a process in front of the Federal Court. They didn't have the exception in their legislation, which you find in some other jurisdictions, and we thought the documents were covered.
Really it's because there was a lack in the act, not dealing with parliamentary privilege, that did not allow them to find the exception that would have been accepted.