I don't do this very often, but I'll ask another question.
You suggested during this process it doesn't matter that it was the AG who had the ask for an access to information, but in this case it was that. They ruled in their thought process that privilege was not one of the exclusionary methods. They had decided parliamentary privilege was not one of the reasons to exclude documents in an ATIP request.
You suggested to them, on our behalf hopefully, that you thought it was a reason for exclusion on an ATIP. They came back and said no, they still thought it wasn't.
Is this where a solution is? Do we just put privilege in that spot where the interpretation is that some privileged documents from committees would be exactly that?