If there are odd situations, I'm sure the Chief Electoral Officer can look at them on a case-by-case basis, but at the end of the day the EDA essentially will be responsible for that loan because it was still guaranteed by the EDA. Also, if the EDA is not responsible for it, or if they default on it, it would go to the party. But when that person was a candidate, the EDA was responsible for that candidate and therefore for the loan as well.
On October 18th, 2012. See this statement in context.