Mr. Drapeau, you said a couple of times that if the decision had been challenged, it would likely have been upheld on judicial review in court.
I'd like to refer you to the Quebec Court of Appeal decision in 1991, National Assembly v. Bayle. I hope that you're familiar with that, because I would be interested in your comment on it, given what you said about a potential challenge here.
In Bayle, as you know, the court upheld the rights of the National Assembly to their claim of privilege to withhold it. Is it that distinguishable? Is the legislation that distinguishable? Have you any comment with respect to that case and what application it has, even the reasoning, to the matters that gave rise to this inquiry?