Thank you.
I understand quite well that in any case, the Constitution has precedence. However, the problem raised by Ms. Legault when she appeared before the committee is that she does not have a choice. She has to comply with the Access to Information Act. Currently, given the text of the Access to Information Act, in such a situation, she will not have a choice. She will have to go to court to explain that there is nothing in the document she depends on that prohibits her from divulging information because of parliamentary privilege.
I understand that in court, the Constitution will always have precedence. That is understandable. Would there not be some way of preventing that and of arranging things so that they are clear immediately, so that there is no need to initiate long, costly legal action to obtain a final decision that will most likely be in favour of the Constitution?