Thank you.
And Mr. Scott, thank you. Those were all good questions.
I have two questions, I think, and I'll lead off from the top. It was suggested that if this change were made in the act, it could have unintended consequences. Is that true of...if we step back? If we were to begin as parliamentarians to reinforce this right in certain pieces of legislation, might a future court—if that were not done down the road—say, well, because Parliament didn't explicitly reinforce its privilege, we're going to assume they didn't want it to be there in another piece of legislation?
You could actually have a cascading effect. You maintain, I think correctly, that this right is there. If we follow that up in legislation, what would the ramifications be where it's not done?