Thank you.
I want to follow up on some of the thoughts Mr. Martin had. I'm going to disagree with him, I think, but I do first want to say that I agree with his thoughts on access to information, and I would actually look favourably on suggestions that we consider extending that law to cover the House of Commons.
But the point I want to make—and I'm curious to get your comments. Is that issue not a different issue than that of privilege? We ought not to surrender that privilege unless we choose to do so—sorry, we ought not to surrender our privilege unless we choose to do so in order to achieve the access to information.
I'm not sure I'm asking this correctly. I think we're two planes trying to go in the same direction; we're just flying at different altitudes. By that I mean we can applaud what Mr. Martin is suggesting here and the need to open up the Access to Information Act, but this is not the way to do it.