No, and in fact it's really up to the House, and members in the House, ultimately, to decide what they want to do with the documents in question being covered by privilege and how they are to be released. On the question that we're dealing with documents that are privileged or covered by parliamentary privilege, it is only for the House to decide how they can be released. Certainly transparency might be a way for the committee to encourage and deal with it in a manner...but it's for the members and then ultimately the House to make that decision. It cannot be surrendered in any other fashion.
The clerk is just mentioning that you have to make that distinction between what is confidential and what is privileged, and again that distinction has to be kept in mind. That's why, through a process where types of documents can be identified, the release could be done to the satisfaction of most requesters. But ultimately, though, it's for the House itself to make that decision, because documents, in our opinion, would have to remain privileged, be covered by privilege, even though they're released.