That being the case, do you think that in general—and I'm not talking just about northern Alberta, but perhaps across Canada—the commissioners should put a greater weight on the geographic size of some of the rural constituencies, versus the population? We all know that many large rural ridings have a relatively small population base but a huge geographical area.
How do you balance that? How do you square that circle, knowing that you need to get face-to-face meetings on behalf of your constituents and that the commission is looking at trying to average, on a population variance, constituency to constituency?