I'm asking that question now to the members who are here and did not agree with the first set of maps. It was a public consultation. In a public consultation, one would think you wouldn't show up and say, “We like the maps, thank you for doing them”, and then leave. That's why you didn't show up there.
The second set of maps that came out in 2013—seen for the first time in this committee—are drastically changed from the first set of maps. It's the biggest change we've seen. This is why you're here today.
The second part of my question is this. Are all four of you in agreement with the changes that are being proposed by all of you? Is there consensus for what you'd like to see?