I'll go back to the question I posed originally. I know there were a number of members as witnesses who wanted to answer. I still don't understand. I don't know how germane it is to the conversation, frankly, but I cannot understand how the commission, which is made up of some very learned people, could bring forward an initial map based on all of the information they had before them and then dramatically change it for the second map. I'm trying to get a sense of why that happened. We've heard from two of the witnesses. I'll ask Mr. McKay, and I'd like to see if we can get all of the witnesses to respond.
On April 30th, 2013. See this statement in context.