Excuse me, it's the “amendment”. I'm just looking procedurally at this—and this is for the benefit of other members as well. One of the questions that has come forward in the debate to this point is around the timing and the urgency of having the vote either today or tomorrow.
I wonder, through you to the clerk, whether it would remain in order if I were to seek an amendment to Mr. Lamoureux's suggestion that would actually state that the committee would come back. I've not seen an amendment like it, so I look to you, again through the clerk, to ask if an amendment can be included in what Mr. Lamoureux has suggested. We don't do friendly amendments as such at these committees, but that would include the idea of first receiving evidence back on the implications of these changes and then allowing the committee to decide. Would that be something, in your or the clerk's estimation, that would be in order—before I start drafting and consider its introduction?