This very matter of privilege is now before this committee. The act does provide a remedy to ask the court to be relieved from a request from the CEO. However, it does not provide for a stay of the whole proceeding, certainly not explicitly in the statute. It's a question to be determined whether a court would entertain a request to stay the effect of 463(2). The court may be also concerned about impeding members' privileges.
The act does provide, from time to time, when there is court remedy available, that it would have the effect of staying. It does not in this case. One thing we haven't had the chance to do is to go back to the history of that provision and find out the intention of parliamentarians at that point.