My first comment is to recognize and not only accept but welcome that there are remedies available when there's a dispute. There's a procedure provided in the act. I respect that fully. These disputes are generally and vastly well intended or carried in good faith. We can have a disagreement on certain provisions in the act.
On section 463, it's more about a procedure than a substantive issue. It's about the fact that a return has been filed and corrected. The correction may raise substantive issues, but section 463 simply says you need to correct or there is a possible suspension of your right to sit and vote. Whether that's a proper remedy, that's how the act is structured right now. Whether it should be amended or not, I just want you to keep in mind that it's meant to get timely and accurate return files.