Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Mr. Mayrand, I think you and I may disagree over how subsection 463(2) ought to be read.
Let me ask you this question. Do you deny that a reasonable person could read your obligations under subsection 463(2) as requiring you to take the action of writing to the Speaker only after court remedies have been used up? That's what I think you should have done. Do you deny that a reasonable person could interpret the law that way, given that the law, as you said, could have been drafted more clearly? You said that in your written presentation.