Sure.
Would you care to render an opinion, Monsieur Mayrand, on whether the act as it is written now is satisfactory and whether or not you believe that, say, all legal recourse should be dispensed with before a letter from the Chief Electoral Officer advises the Speaker that the member may be in non-compliance? That's why I asked the original question about the amount. I realize there's a principle here, and one could argue that it doesn't matter if it's $100 or $100,000, but what I'm getting at is if there is a legitimate dispute between a member and Elections Canada, do you have an opinion on whether or not action should be taken to remove a member from his seat immediately, or do you believe it would be appropriate to have all legal appeals exhausted before the final decision to remove that member?