Thank you, Chair.
As I was saying, the first point in my motion is that we hear witnesses from, but not limited to, Elections Canada, political parties as defined, the Minister of State—and I made some comments about that—and representatives of first nations. Again, this is where we come to relevancy. I was talking about the grand chief. That's the kind of person we should call. Then I was backing up my argument by reading his qualifications.
Now, the government may not want to hear all that. I accept that. But there is nothing untoward when we make the case that we think representatives of the first nations should be there and then, in another breath, we describe the biography and the qualifications of that person or those kinds of representatives. I'm shoring up my argument, because if I were on the other side, you could ask the question, why would we invite him? So that's—