I just want to ask what the rules of the game are, then, Mr. Chairman? If the point of order has been made about repetition, then I think my colleague has a valid point. Just how fine is this line going to go?
For instance, this is the first time that I've heard him state categorically that the 41st federal election was decided by widespread electoral fraud, and that, to my mind, is something we should all be horrified by. Perhaps, in and of itself, it's justification for taking this—