On the point of order, Mr. Chair, just so that we understand each other, there is a provision in the rules governing this committee with regard to relevance. There's no problem with that. But as we've just demonstrated, this is directly relevant to the motion being discussed.
With regard to whether or not you find it too long, that's a personal evaluation, and I understand that you find it difficult to have the continuing failure of your government put before you—their failure to consult, their failure to work with other parties, their failure to listen to Canadians—but unfortunately, that part of it is not in the orders that govern the functioning of this committee.
Whether you like it or not, these are the rules that we're governed by. Relevance is proven. It is directly relevant. He hasn't spoken about this individual before; he explained to you that this was new.
I put it to you that, following the rules that govern our Parliament—and you're asked to apply them on behalf of all of us—he's allowed to continue.