I have a point of order on Mr. Lamoureux's point of order.
Can Mr. Lamoureux or anyone else show me the procedural guidelines to permit that sort of thing? We're in the midst of a filibuster. We're asking for David to continue. We're not giving concurrence. We're not giving agreement to adjourn the meeting at one o'clock. That's been established. We've already cited the precedent for that.
I know no such precedent that allows interruption of a filibuster to entertain questions.