Well, in point of fact I'm trying to address the perception that has been brought forth, which is in my view nothing but a perception, that there are problems with vouching by utilizing other sections of the bill, where it says that in these cases—impersonation, someone else having voted in someone's place—you will now have to sign that oath, as opposed to only taking it orally. I'm saying okay, if that's what you want to do. If that solves that particular problem, then it must obviously be able to solve the problem of the perception that some people have about the vouching system.
I will add that with respect to the returning officers, there have been comments made that we appointed...which were predominantly Liberals. That was an excellent move on your part, sir, and I thank you on behalf of Canadians, on the appointment of returning officers. Just so everyone knows, we were obligated by that law to seek the advice of every party leader about every returning officer, and any party leader who objected to any returning officer, that name was off the list. I did not care who objected. We did not overturn any political leader. So the 180 people who were left as returning officers were all people who had been accepted by all the parties.