Perhaps I could start this round.
Whether we have the right number of type two documents is a never-ending question. In British Columbia we don't specifically identify all of the identification documents that are acceptable. We have categories of documents that are acceptable, and it's at the determination of the Chief Electoral Officer whether a document would be approved or not.
We had some commentary this past election on one of the documents that we included for the first time. Historically what we've done in British Columbia is we've accepted a hospital bracelet as an identity document. Even mentioning that document, I think, gives people a sense of the breadth of the documents that can be used for ID in British Columbia.
Then, we were working with one of the agencies in the downtown eastside of Vancouver, which indicated to us that many of their clients were unable to satisfy the voter ID requirements even with an expansive list of documents. We agreed that we would accept a prescription medication label as one of the identity documents, because among this group of eligible voters, who often don't carry very many identify documents, this is a document that many of them possessed. Now, that document in and of itself could not demonstrate their identity, could not satisfy the identity requirements. It would have to be used in conjunction with another document, such as an attestation of residence from a homeless shelter, for example.
That example illustrates that the agencies work with various service organizations to understand how our different groups of electors can ensure that they can exercise their democratic right and not be disenfranchised administratively because they don't carry the same kinds of documents that other voters may carry as a matter of course.