It might very well be time for a reassessment, but that hasn't occurred. A decision has just been taken. It's a bit of a rabbit out of a hat, if I can use a metaphor.
I think a study on some of these things—it is 10 years after the act.... In fact, in the 2004 legislation there is a requirement that the act be reviewed, I believe, after five years. That never occurred. But if it's going to be reviewed, witnesses should be called, options should be examined, and so on, rather than a decision being made that is not even explained in a backgrounder. That's how limited the evidence is.