I would suggest that eliminating the taxpayer subsidy would be one of the public policy rationales.
I'll move quickly to your third point, the bifurcation, as I might call it, of the Commissioner of Canada Elections.
In your public policy experience, from a public administration standpoint, is there not a move away from multi-functional agencies that both enforce rules and create policy going forward, and that look back and investigate and prosecute? The Ontario Securities Commission, the British Columbia Securities Commission, a number of these provincial securities agencies have recognized the inherent conflict of both a forward-thinking policy role and a backward-thinking investigation and prosecution. Would this change not be in line with some of those public administration changes in the last two decades?