If I may, I'll just continue on and hopefully finalize the last thoughts on the line of questioning I've been pursuing.
There have been from time to time many candidates from different political parties who have been fined by the CRTC for various transgressions, going back again to the judgment call. Do you think it would be helpful to have a tighter set of determinants for the CRTC when examining cases in which there have been violations, or are you satisfied that the definitions provided to you in their current state are sufficient? In other words, would you like to see a little bit more guidance, or are you satisfied that what you have now ultimately will lead to proper decision-making?