If I may, because I don't have much time, I use the securities commission example because of the regulatory overhaul in the last 15 years, and because I think it serves very similar purposes in the public interest. I sprung this on you now, so feel free to provide the committee with your comments afterwards, but do you not see the benefit, from a public confidence standpoint, of having that administrative function housed in one distinct administrative body, Elections Canada, and your function, the investigative aspect, housed separately, much like the securities commissions have done?
On April 1st, 2014. See this statement in context.