Yes, I agree with that.
Mr. Quail said that most Canadians have driver's licences. In fact, I think the last number I saw was that 85% of voting-age Canadians have a driver's licence. There is actually quite a large proportion of Canadians who need to find some alternative way to vote.
There's an easy solution to your question, which is that we can expand national ID. The government can provide cost-free, easily accessible national ID that can be used to vote. This is what a recent U.K. report suggested, exactly this. That the U.K. should have more stringent voting requirements but that they must be accompanied, in order to avoid accessibility problems and in order to avoid violating political equality, what should happen is that the government should fully fund and make extremely accessible national ID, which would be a solution to the problem.
We have a direction. The Canadian government has moved in that direction by issuing VICs, and the bill proposes to eliminate VICs. But that's exactly the wrong thing to do, if what you're concerned about is protecting the integrity of a system by requiring identification.
I don't see anything wrong with people identifying themselves. People should be required in certain situations to identify themselves. But if identification is required for voting, then the onus is on the government to make sure that the ID is provided easily and free of charge.